Related to the above critique is the fact that the categories that Regnerus used are not mutually exclusive, but yet were treated as such for purposes ************SPAM/BANNEAR************ analyzing the data. Namely, participants who fall into the “lesbian mother” and “gay father” categories may quite plausibly also be in any other category as well (e.g., they may also be from divorced, single parent, or intact biological families), and, indeed most ************SPAM/BANNEAR************ them almost certainly were. Thus, as Andrew Perrin points out, in his excellent critique ************SPAM/BANNEAR************ the study, “the analytical strategy amounts to manufacturing a virtual world that doesn’t fit the data at all, then analyzing that world. Why do it this way? Well, ‘gay and lesbian parents, as well as heterosexual adoptive parents, can be challenging to identify and locate.’ [Regnerus’s] article goes to great lengths to explain how hard they worked to find the necessary respondents. But trying really hard doesn’t help when the conceptual category is fatally flawed. The parents discussed aren’t, by and large, gay and lesbian parents!”
.gif "Emoticon Super Facc Pack1 Www.ptkweb.it (55) :guacala:")
